EXP3 - MASH UP

Mash up

The concise Oxford Dictionary defines simple as “not compound, consisting of one element, all of one kind, involving only one operation or power.” In the context of this paper, simplicity contains some level of consistency in the patterns and components that are a flexible concept that will ensure the sustainability of the project and architectural design. As simplicity increases, it ensures consistency of buildings throughout the territory, construction quality, respect of rural identity and recognition of the regional territory icons and landscape memory. There are both objective and subjective varieties of organisational simplicity, and most of these are interdependent. The objectives considered in the architectural approach are dominance of a single goal or subunit, information systems and routines that organisation must have open, consistent, frequent, and quality communication between teams. As yet, we have only dealt individually with the factors that contribute to simplicity. The key challenge to a meritocratic process though is Composition of a quality project that stands out positively in terms of simplicity and stagnation. Again, the result is a simpler to achieve consistency and more consistent view of the world.

Overall Concept review : Consistency is a quality of Simplicity.
Folly: Simplicity can achieve Consistency.

Pritchett, Dan. "Consistency vs.Innovatio" 10 Nov 2010. Accessed 13 May 2013. <http://www.addsimplicity.com/adding_simplicity_an_engi/2010/11/consistency-vs-innovation.html>

"Research and Training Centre in the Construction Trades / ACDF*" 12 Jan 2011. ArchDaily. Accessed 13 May 2013. <http://www.archdaily.com/103509>

Miller, Danny. "The Architecture of Simplicity" The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Jan., 1993): 116-138 Accessed: 13/05/2013. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/258825>